Home >> Commentary >> Commentary >> Why I am not a fan of Charles Darwin - The Darwinian Excuse for Racism
.

English Chinese (Simplified) French German Italian Polish Portuguese Spanish
____________

 

 

Our Contributors

Max Arnott

Olavo de Carvalho

Robert Cheeks

Meins G.S. Coetsier

Barry Cooper

Sylvie Courtine-Denamy

Jack D. Elliott

Charles Embry

Alvino-Mario Fantini

Juergen Gebhardt

Thierry Gontier

Nathan Harter

Grant Havers

Thomas Heilke

John von Heyking

Glenn Hughes

Myron M. Jackson

Jerry L. Martin

Steven McGuire

Francesca Murphy

David Palmieri

Fr. Brendan Purcell

James M. Rhodes

Ellis Sandoz

Scott Segrest

Rouven Steeves

Henrik Syse

Lee Trepanier

Jonathan Wensveen

Eric G. Wilson

David Walsh

____________

You can help VoegelinView defray operating expenses by shopping at amazon.com. They will pay us a fee on books and other things they sell, but only if you go to amazon.com from here.

You can get to amazon.com by clicking on a book ad or you can click HERE.

 

 

In consideratione creaturarum non est vana et peritura curiositas exercenda; sed gradus ad immortalia et semper manentia faciendus.
—St Augustine
De vera religione

C O M M E N T A R Y

PDF Print E-mail

 

The Darwinian Excuse for Racism

 

Purely farcical, however, is the general attempt to camouflage the genocidal ideology that is embedded in the very internal logic of the theory of evolution. When the apologists of the British scientist acknowledge, against their will, that evolution was “used” to legitimize racism and mass murders, they do so with a monstrous hypocrisy.

 

Darwinism is genocidal by itself, from its very roots. It did not have to be deformed by disloyal disciples to become something it was not. Just read the following paragraphs by Charles Darwin and tell me honestly whether racism and apology of genocide had to be grafted onto an innocent theory afterwards:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes. . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.1

 

Imagine if, during the American presidential elections, John McCain’s campaign declared that Barack Hussein Obama was closer to the gorilla than the Republican candidate!

 

And there is more: “Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world!”

 

To finish the point, an unequivocal appeal to the extermination of the undesirable:

With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination. We build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to smallpox. Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind.
No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.2

 

Notice well: I am not against the evolutionist hypothesis. From what I have observed thus far, I must conclude that I am the only human being in my inner and outer circle who does not have the least idea whether evolution happened or not. Everyone has beliefs about it and seems willing to die or kill for them. I have none.

 

However, my abstinence from opinion with regard to a problem that I consider unsolvable does not forbid me to perceive the absurdity of the opinions of those who hold one. I understood a long time ago that scientists are even less trustworthy than politicians, and the paradoxes of Charles Darwin’s fame do nothing but confirm it. My mischievous instincts compel me to grab Darwinists by the throat and ask them:

 

"Why so much fuss about Charles Darwin? He invented “intelligent design,” which you hate, and natural selection, which you say is false. He overtly preached racism and genocide, which you proclaim to abhor. To celebrate him, you must create out of nothing a fictitious character that is the opposite of whom he was historically. Can’t you see that all of this is just buffoonery?"       

 

alt

 

Olavo de Carvalho taught Political Philosophy in graduate courses in Public Administration at the Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil from 2001 to 2005. He has written twelve books and is a columnist of Jornal do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro) and Diário do Comércio (São Paulo). He lives in Richmond, Virginia. Website: www.olavodecarvalho.org.

 

NOTES

 

1. Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Ch 6 "On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man." See Literature.org online archive.

2. Ibid., Chapter 5 "On the Development of the Intellectual and Moral Faculties During Primeval and Civilised Times". See Literature.org online archive.

 



 

 


Designed with the Firefox Browser in mind
Contents Copyright © Wagner Columbus Publishing Co Ltd

 

.

Banner
.
Banner

 

Our Staff

 

James Rovira
Managing Editor

Max Arnott 
Associate Editor

Scott Robinson
Associate Editor

John von Heyking
Book Reviews Editor

Thomas D'Evelyn
Poetry Editor

Jack D. Elliott
Forum Moderator

Myron Moses Jackson
Assist. forum Moderator

Judy Wagner
Copy Editor

Isabela Yumi Mori
Technical Advisor

 

 

Board of Advisors

 

Ellis Sandoz —Senior Advisor

Glenn Hughes

Barry Cooper

David Walsh

Beverly Jarrett

___________


Fritz Wagner
Executive Editor

Wagner Columbus
Publishing Co Ltd
Publisher

Banner

"So you, son of man, I have made a watchman for the house of Israel; whenever you hear a word from my mouth, you shall give them warning from me. If I say to the wicked, O wicked man, you shall surely die, and you do not speak to warn the wicked to turn from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at your hand. But if you warn the wicked to turn from his way, and he does not turn from his way; he shall die in his iniquity, but you will have saved your life."
Ezekiel, chapter 33, verses 7-9

Quoted in Hitler and the Germans, CW 31, p 201.